Episode 14 radioisotope dating an evolutionists best friend wmv dual income no kids dating

Posted by / 02-Jul-2017 00:11

C at all if they really were over a billion years old, yet the radiocarbon lab reported that there was over 10 times the detection limit.

Thus they had a radiocarbon ‘age’ far less than a million years!

reaches millions of people each year–many of these aren't believers in our Creator and Savior Jesus Christ.

The presence of radiocarbon in these diamonds where there should be none is thus sparkling evidence for a ‘young’ world, as the Bible records.Relative ages are assigned to rocks based on the idea that rock layers lower in the strata were deposited before rock layers that are higher.Creationists do not necessarily disagree with this concept, but it can only be applied to layers that are found in one location and/or can be determined to have been deposited in a continuous layer over a very wide area.Some are found in these pipes, such as kimberlites, while other diamonds were liberated by water erosion and deposited elsewhere (called alluvial diamonds).According to evolutionists, the diamonds formed about 1–3 billion years ago.

episode 14 radioisotope dating an evolutionists best friend wmv-9episode 14 radioisotope dating an evolutionists best friend wmv-83episode 14 radioisotope dating an evolutionists best friend wmv-11

There is also a difference in the timescale used to explain the layers.